Suppose that you were the owner of a National Basketball Association team. Furthermore, it is not clear that all blacks were harmed in the same way or whether some Affirmative action thesis unjustly harmed or harmed more than poor whites and others e.
Even though we do not know which Hatfield youths did the stealing, we would want to restore the wealth, as far as possible, to the McCoys. Suppose further that Michael Jordan and I are in high school together and we are both qualified to play basketball, only he is far better than I.
At this point we get into the problem of whether innocent non-blacks should have to pay a penalty in terms of preferential hiring of blacks. These reasons are not absolutes.
Hence, it is only fair - productive of justice - to aim at proportionate representation in these fields. A White policeman must be able to arrest a Black burglar, even as a Black policeman must be able to arrest a White rapist.
This is not to argue that Blacks should be maintained in such positions, but their contrived exclusion merits equally contrived rectification. The notion of desert seems not to apply to these cases. The criterion most often designated is social utility.
Suppose that White policemen overreact to young Black males and the latter group distrust White policemen. It says it is right to do wrong to correct a wrong. Of course, we might want to distinguish moral from legal desert and argue that, morally speaking, effort is more important than outcome, whereas, legally speaking, outcome may be more important.
Therefore, society may override their qualifications in awarding jobs and positions as it sees fit for social utility or to compensate for previous wrongs. Normally, we think of compensation as owed by a specific person A to another person B whom A has wronged in a specific way C.
Baltes brandtst dter, chapter, this handbook, and continues to be a powerful operating component influencing a girl dealing with the game play on more subtle than either tradition did not focally intend them. Opponents of affirmative action are hung up on a distinction that seems more profoundly irrelevant: The Diversity Argument It is important that we learn to live in a pluralistic world, learning to get along with those of other races and cultures, so we should have fully integrated schools and employment situations.
And likewise with airplane pilots, military leaders, business executives, and, may I say it, teachers and university professors. They can be overridden. It says that it is society's fault that the Blue children are not as able as the Greens and that the Greens must pay extra taxes to enable the Blues to compete.
We do act freely and, as such, we are responsible for our actions. People have to take some responsibility for their actions. Why should the evidence for this be completely discounted? Secondly, the normal criterion of competence is a strong prima facie consideration when the most important positions are at stake.
Society may award jobs and positions as it sees fit as long as individuals have no claim to these positions. Society may award jobs and positions as it sees fit as long as individuals have no claim to these positions.
But, my thesis is, however tragic the situation may be and we may disagree on just how tragic it isone policy is not a legitimate part of the solution and that is reverse, unjust discrimination against young white males. Might this not be a reason to reconsider Affirmative Action?
However, Arthur, Mosley, and Harwood fail even to consider studies that suggest that there are innate differences between races, sexes, and groups. Suppose that the Hatfields and the McCoys are enemy clans and some youths from the Hatfields go over and steal diamonds and gold from the McCoys, distributing it within the Hatfield economy.
We turn to that argument. Much of the harm done to blacks was the result of private discrimination, not state action. We need to compare average IQ scores, SAT scores, standard personality testing, success in academic and professional areas and the like.
But why does society have to enter into this results game in the first place?Affirmative Action Thesis: Although many people believe that affirmative Action is a form of racism, it is actually used to help minorities find employment in an otherwise racist world.
"In the United States, equality is a recurring theme. affirmative action (e.g., quotas, goals, and preferences); the comis' interpretation of affirmative action; the arguments for and against affirmative action; and recent developments pertaining to affirmative action.
affirmative action By: lauren Affirmative Action Thesis: Although many people believe that affirmative Action is a form of racism, it is actually used to help minorities find employment in an otherwise racist world.
"In the United States, equality is a recurring theme. Mar 15, · Thesis statement for Affirmative Action? Hi guys tomorrow I have to have a proposal paper written for my English class and in it I have to of course state a thesis about what ever subject I choose. I think I'm going to go with Affirmative Action for this currclickblog.com: Resolved.
The basic idea behind affirmative action is that in the absence of discrimination, all races, genders and religions should be distributed exactly according to their population at every level and corner of society.
Government should carefully class. Mar 14, · Help I need ideas! Thesis statement for Affirmative Action? Hi guys tomorrow I have to have a proposal paper written for my English class and in it I have to of course state a thesis about what ever subject I currclickblog.com: Resolved.Download